Swap execution facilities: A catalyst for OTC change?
Written by Jim Myers, Kimon Mikroulis and Paul Gibson of Sapient Global Markets
SEF trading and the “electronification” of
the OTC marketplace are still in their infancy. From the SEF trade volumes
published to date, it seems likely that established interdealer brokers and
firms with significant pre-SEF volumes appear poised to ”win” the first phase
of mandatory SEF execution. Newly established SEFs have struggled and will be
forced to specialise, differentiate and innovate with value-added offerings.
There is a significant likelihood that many
former dealers will increasingly depend on a more fee-based revenue model,
which could include charges for execution, connectivity, clearing and
collateral management services.
One key trend to observe over the coming
months, alongside SEF aggregation and new business models for banks, is the
convergence of OTC and exchange-traded derivative (ETDs).
There is a view among some market
participants that demand will shift away from OTC trading on SEFs due to
increasingly onerous regulatory requirements and move toward ETDs, specifically
swap futures. Swap futures are designed to mimic standardised OTC swaps but
have reduced margin requirements relative to cleared swaps.
While there has been an increase in the
volume of swap futures, this trend does not necessarily reflect a wholesale
shift away from OTC products. In fact, results from ISDA’s recent survey of 245
market participants on the economic value of OTC derivatives imply they are
becoming a more popular form of risk management: 80% of respondents expect to
use them going forward.
In this context, the differences between OTC swaps, swap futures and other
exchange-traded derivatives are significant.
Among the most important are the hedge
accounting rules, which are commonly used by swap users to mitigate undesirable
earnings volatility caused by mark-to-market valuations. This relief to the
mark-to-market rules is only available if the hedging party can clearly
document the ability of the hedge to mitigate an actual risk.
With the standardisation inherent in a swap
futures contract, the risk mitigation argument is significantly more difficult
to make due to a standardised contract’s inability to mirror the precise risk
factor.
Additionally, there is significant
uncertainty around the way in which the IRS will treat these futurised swaps
for tax purposes. These differences, along with the uncertainty around the
long-term regulatory treatment of swap futures, have proven to serve as a
disincentive toward broader and faster adoption of swap futures products.
Price discovery on SEFs can occur through a
request for quote (RFQ) or central limit order book (CLOB). To date, the vast
majority of current SEF volume is conducted using the RFQ methodology, which is
relationship based and follows an on-demand market-making principle. CLOBs,
which are common in the ETD and equities world, are characterised by a
continuous stream of prices on both sides of a market. CLOBs are common in
products with high volumes and liquidity.
At this point, it is unclear as to the role
that CLOBs will play in the evolution of the SEF markets. In the listed space,
quotes of small notional value are often streamed into a CLOB. As a market
participant seeks to execute a transaction, he or she would submit an RFQ. As
other market participants respond to the RFQ, the width of the market would
tighten and the size available to trade would increase. This is a likely first
step in the creation of a CLOB on a SEF.
With their unique market structure, SEFs
can connect to multiple CCPs and market participants can connect to one or more
SEFs either directly or through an FCM. Given that products are fungible on the
CCP level, the choice of SEF is unimportant. Over time and as market
participants get over their initial frantic onboarding to SEFs, best execution
in terms of price will become more important, as will terms common in listed
products, such as the width and depth of the market. The SEFs able to foster
the creation of these “best markets” will be the long-term winners in the
space.
The single largest area of convergence may
well lie in the impact of electronic trading on the OTC market. While mandatory
electronic trading is still in its infancy, there are some signs that those
familiar with the transition to electronic trading in the listed space will
recognise.
New entrants and former market takers who
have not previously acted as OTC market makers are beginning to change the
market and bring their own version of aggressive market making, speed and risk
management to bear. Market takers are increasingly requesting RFQs from the
entire market and not just from those dealers with whom they have prior
relationships.
There has been evidence that some
traditional buy-side firms have been actively “making markets” for other
buy-side firm’s RFQs resulting in a new “all-to-all” market paradigm. Many
market participants are anticipating continued rapid evolution over the course
of the next twelve to eighteen months.
Jim
Myers is a senior manager of business consulting based in Chicago, Kimon
Mikroulis is an associate and Paul Gibson is a business consultant, both based
in London at Sapient Global Markets.
Found this useful?
Take a complimentary trial of the FOW Marketing Intelligence Platform – the comprehensive source of news and analysis across the buy- and sell- side.
Gain access to:
- A single source of in-depth news, insight and analysis across Asset Management, Securities Finance, Custody, Fund Services and Derivatives
- Our interactive database, optimized to enable you to summarise data and build graphs outlining market activity
- Exclusive whitepapers, supplements and industry analysis curated and published by Futures & Options World
- Breaking news, daily and weekly alerts on the markets most relevant to you