EU money market regs welcomed
The EU Money Market Fund Regulation was been signed off yesterday in a
form that is much more by the industry than the original proposal.
The Council of Ministers yesterday signed off the regulation in a
meeting of EU Ambassadors (COREPER) and this morning it was confirmed by the
European Parliament’s ECON Committee. The orginal proposal from the European
Commission was put forwad in 2013.
European asset management trade body EFAMA welcomed the outcome as more
workable for its members managing money market fund (MMFs), of both variable
and constant net asset value funds (VNAV and CNAV respectively).
Peter De Proft, director general of EFAMA, said: “From the outset, we
have indicated that a proportionate and balanced Regulation which ensures the
viability of both CNAV and VNAV MMFs can support alternative sources of
financing to the real economy, a key focus of the European Commission’s
flagship initiative on a Capital Markets Union.
“In terms of CNAV MMFs, we welcome the creation of the LVNAV product which has the possibility of offering investors a real alternative to European CNAV Prime MMFs.
"Equally important is the retention of a workable government
CNAV regime in different currencies. For the VNAV industry, a number of serious
operational challenges have been minimised. However, the MMFR is by no means a
panacea for either the industry or investors in MMFs.”
While the final regulations were welcomed
concerns remain around liquidity
calculations. EFAMA describes the thresholds set in the final political
agreement as “arbitrary” and the lack of a principles-based approach to
calculations mean they may not be workable in all market conditions.
EFAMA also criticised the barring of MMFs from
being allowed to operate as fund-of-funds, which is used by VNAV managers to achieve
diversification. In addition, it questioned how the exemption from the 10% diversification limit of assets in
deposits would work as well as whether it would be practical for smaller
managers to apply know-your-customer requirements.
De Proft added: “One cannot ignore the number of question marks on the
potential consequences of different parts of the agreement. It remains to be
seen whether smaller players will be able to continue operating, given the more
elaborate compliance and disclosure requirements, combined with low business
margins.”
Found this useful?
Take a complimentary trial of the FOW Marketing Intelligence Platform – the comprehensive source of news and analysis across the buy- and sell- side.
Gain access to:
- A single source of in-depth news, insight and analysis across Asset Management, Securities Finance, Custody, Fund Services and Derivatives
- Our interactive database, optimized to enable you to summarise data and build graphs outlining market activity
- Exclusive whitepapers, supplements and industry analysis curated and published by Futures & Options World
- Breaking news, daily and weekly alerts on the markets most relevant to you