Whatever happened to the surveillance beast?

Whatever happened to the surveillance beast?

When level 1 of the Market Abuse Directive (MAD) II was discussed two years ago there was talk of Esma potentially establishing a massive centralised database for cross-market monitoring, aka the surveillance beast.

Interestingly, this idea didn’t make it into the final MAR text. Instead it calls on each regulator to have in place the necessary tools for effective cross-market order book surveillance and to co-operate with each other.

Also, the European Commission has to submit a report by June 2019 on the possibility of establishing a Union framework for cross-market order book surveillance. In other words, legislators will not consider the surveillance beast for the next five years.

In the meantime, Esma focuses on harmonising the record keeping standards under Mifir which will certainly simplify any exchange of data amongst competent authorities.

 That certainly sounds much cheaper than the US CAT system, estimated in the region of $530 million (down from previous estimates of $4bn).

Whether Europe sticks with a decentralised but standardised regime, or moves towards a more centralised monitoring system, remains to be seen, but given the continuous stream of new consultations published by Esma this is a discussion that we can thankfully postpone.

Thought Leaders

SmartStream RDU gears up for Mifid II challenge

SmartStream won the FOW Award for best new technology product in both the trade...

Total Return Futures - a real-life example for futurisation

Eurex won the FOW Prop Traders' exchange of the year award

ABN AMRO Clearing is optimistic about the future of proprietary trading

ABN AMRO Clearing won the award for proprietary traders' clearing firm of the...

Wematch: Shining a light on collateral and securities financing

Wematch discusses regulatory tailwinds, building liquidity and supporting banks...